EU. In or out?

Anything goes, and mine's a Guinness.
moto al
Posts: 11334
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 8:24 pm
Has thanked: 158 times
Been thanked: 170 times

Re: EU. In or out?

Post by moto al »

Out or in ,this will affect us All.
image_2016-09-30.jpeg
image_2016-09-30.jpeg (69.66 KiB) Viewed 575 times
moto al
Redmurty
Posts: 11716
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 6:44 pm
Has thanked: 337 times
Been thanked: 153 times

Re: EU. In or out?

Post by Redmurty »

moto al wrote:Out or in ,this will affect us All.
image_2016-09-30.jpeg
exactly my point Al (thumbs)

the 2 top banks in Germany are in a really bad way, that will have a massive knock on effect for Italy, my question was would merkel bail them out ? as she played hard ball with Greece and Italy.

Will she use the German tax payers money to pay a fine to the Americans ?

The future of the EU looks less certain by the day, to survive they are going to need to make some massive changes but I'm not sure the old guard will do that

cheers Spud ;)
Life... it's not a dress rehearsal



You don't waste time... you waste yourself
Old Git Ray
Posts: 2044
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 12:17 pm
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 28 times

Re: EU. In or out?

Post by Old Git Ray »

Redmurty wrote:..............

The Italian primeminster is holding a referendum on completely changing the way Italy is run as their economy is flat lining along with the French one and now Sarkosy has stated that if he gets elected he will push to keep the UK in the EU and offer far better terms as he stated it was idiocy to let the 2nd largest contributor to leave.

cheers Spud ;)
Could this be the problem. They just want our money ?

BTW, do you know (in English please) what it is they will be asking.
IMHO this definitely would be a problem for the public to figure out, like Ralph said above.
Redmurty
Posts: 11716
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 6:44 pm
Has thanked: 337 times
Been thanked: 153 times

Re: EU. In or out?

Post by Redmurty »

Old Git Ray wrote:
Redmurty wrote:..............

The Italian primeminster is holding a referendum on completely changing the way Italy is run as their economy is flat lining along with the French one and now Sarkosy has stated that if he gets elected he will push to keep the UK in the EU and offer far better terms as he stated it was idiocy to let the 2nd largest contributor to leave.

cheers Spud ;)
Could this be the problem. They just want our money ?

BTW, do you know (in English please) what it is they will be asking.
IMHO this definitely would be a problem for the public to figure out, like Ralph said above.
my understanding is and bearing in mind I'm not intelligent enough to have a vote :whistle: is that the main man wants to change the senate and change the way Italy is run, he has said he will change Italy and the way it's run or leave politics.

Like the French the government want to change business and working practice to try to boost their respective flat line economies.

Italy has massive unemployment issue and has a corruption problem, his comments not mine.

As I have previously stated the EU is failing the very people it is there to support,

could it be a problem they want our money, I think they need our money more than they want it

cheers Spud ;)
Life... it's not a dress rehearsal



You don't waste time... you waste yourself
User avatar
Scott_rider
Posts: 2460
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012 12:47 pm
Has thanked: 29 times
Been thanked: 313 times

Re: EU. In or out?

Post by Scott_rider »

The potential problems with Deutche Bank and secondly with the Italian economy were talked about way before we voted 'out'. If we had voted 'in' these problems would still be there but we would have been involved in sorting them out. Of course, we will still be affected by the fallout but I think it's better that we can now concentrate on sorting out or own business.

I'm glad we voted 'OUT' (thumbs) .
Suzuki GSX-S1000F...the KTM 450 EXC-R has gone
Redmurty
Posts: 11716
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 6:44 pm
Has thanked: 337 times
Been thanked: 153 times

Re: EU. In or out?

Post by Redmurty »

Scott_rider wrote:The potential problems with Deutche Bank and secondly with the Italian economy were talked about way before we voted 'out'. If we had voted 'in' these problems would still be there but we would have been involved in sorting them out. Of course, we will still be affected by the fallout but I think it's better that we can now concentrate on sorting out or own business.

I'm glad we voted 'OUT' (thumbs) .
yeah the banking problem has been going on for quite a while but now only seems to have hit the headlines :whistle:

The German banking systems has always been seen as the bedrock for the EU :whistle:

cheers Spud ;)
Life... it's not a dress rehearsal



You don't waste time... you waste yourself
-Ralph-
Posts: 6803
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 7:16 pm

Re: EU. In or out?

Post by -Ralph- »

dave448 wrote:the thing is ...I have just realised (somewhat late in life) ...that MPs represent parliament to us ....they do not represent us to parliament...
this means
they don't really giveatoss about what you think ...except when elections come up...
Syria vote august 2013? A direct result of lots of people writing to their MP's to express their wishes. Beat the party whips, beat the Prime Minister.

The biggest danger to democracy is complacency.

If we all believe they don't give a toss and stop bothering, then we deserve a parliament that doesn't represent us. The more noise we make, the more we get involved, the more they will listen and represent us.

We get the government we deserve.
"Luke, you're going to find that many of the truths we cling to depend greatly on our own point of view" - Obi-Wan Kenobi
-Ralph-
Posts: 6803
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 7:16 pm

Re: EU. In or out?

Post by -Ralph- »

Old Git Ray wrote:In my view, one of the main reasons people voted Brexit was the corruption and complete disregard for the voting public that MPs and MEPs have
Absolutely agree, but they didn't just vote against corruption and disregard in Brussels, they voted against it in Westminster, but that wasn't the question on the ballot paper, so a significant number of the electorate didn't manage to keep their mind on the task in hand. I'm not going to go into my reasons why I think direct democracy is dangerous I've said them all already, but the old saying about letting the kiddies run the kindergarten is very valid and wise.
"Luke, you're going to find that many of the truths we cling to depend greatly on our own point of view" - Obi-Wan Kenobi
AndyB
Posts: 8747
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 12:04 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: EU. In or out?

Post by AndyB »

Why wouldn't Merkel help German banks? We helped ours out when they were in trouble, the Americans did the same when they started all the problems by lending rednecks money they couldn't repay so obviously it would be reasonable for the Germans to do the same if they can afford it.

Germany played hardball with Greece because Greece didn't have the money to bail their banks out and does anyone seriously believe that the Greek Goverment would have helped even if they could?
Old Git Ray
Posts: 2044
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 12:17 pm
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 28 times

Re: EU. In or out?

Post by Old Git Ray »

-Ralph- wrote:
Old Git Ray wrote:In my view, one of the main reasons people voted Brexit was the corruption and complete disregard for the voting public that MPs and MEPs have
Absolutely agree, but they didn't just vote against corruption and disregard in Brussels, they voted against it in Westminster, but that wasn't the question on the ballot paper, so a significant number of the electorate didn't manage to keep their mind on the task in hand. I'm not going to go into my reasons why I think direct democracy is dangerous I've said them all already, but the old saying about letting the kiddies run the kindergarten is very valid and wise.
I agree with what you say completetly. However, people take their chances when they can and this was an opportunity to express their feelings and they took it - those that bothered to get out of bed that is. :whistle: It was a 'clever person' that decided they could have this vote - then he buggered off but that is another story. :pinch:
I understand what you say about democracy and agree on that too but the alternative is a dictatorship. A dictatorship has it's plusses in that stuff does get done but it relies on a sensible person being at the helm. If he/she is a magalomaniac, they are in power till they die or they get invaded.

On the bright side, for you personally, it appears that Europeans already established here will be safe. (thumbs)
Post Reply

Return to “THE PUB”