Re: Managed Motorways
Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2016 6:28 pm
Just to be clear, that's from the CCTV cameras, not the SPECS.Spout wrote:Full coverage CCTV (recorded and stored) also picks up dangerous driving
https://www.adventurebikerider.com/forum/
https://www.adventurebikerider.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=40943
Just to be clear, that's from the CCTV cameras, not the SPECS.Spout wrote:Full coverage CCTV (recorded and stored) also picks up dangerous driving
It's the coach driver who was on trial. It doesn't matter if the other guy was the biggest idiot in the world, the only thing that is under consideration in the courtroom is the coach drivers actions. No basis for appeal because of the other guy.Richard Simpson wrote:"Mr Dorling, 23, of Milton Keynes, told the jury Mr Evans, of Islington, London, agreed to drive them home for £60 after a night out at London club Egg and had stopped the car to top it up with oil."
'Hire and reward'?
Was he licensed and insured for that? Had his car passed the taxi MoT?
If I was the coach driver, I'd appeal!
Absolutely. The car drivers actions, be they legal or otherwise did not contribute to the fact that the bus driver ignored the red cross denoting the closure of the hard shoulder.-Ralph- wrote:It's the coach driver who was on trial. It doesn't matter if the other guy was the biggest idiot in the world, the only thing that is under consideration in the courtroom is the coach drivers actions. No basis for appeal because of the other guy.Richard Simpson wrote:"Mr Dorling, 23, of Milton Keynes, told the jury Mr Evans, of Islington, London, agreed to drive them home for £60 after a night out at London club Egg and had stopped the car to top it up with oil."
'Hire and reward'?
Was he licensed and insured for that? Had his car passed the taxi MoT?
If I was the coach driver, I'd appeal!