The high headstock is a necessity. Vertical twin engine with a wet sump + the necessary ground-clearance and suspension travel = high headstock and 'knacker-cracker' tank.
The 950 was a dry-sump V-twin for a reason...and this is the reason!
But one of the reasons the Yam is so cheap is it uses the engine found in Yamaha road-bikes. So I think they've made the best of a bad job. And you get a twin for the same price as a European single (KTM/Husky/AJP).
T700 v KTM 950 Adv
-
Richard Simpson Mark II
- Posts: 3769
- Joined: Tue May 09, 2017 9:03 pm
- Has thanked: 1613 times
- Been thanked: 1831 times
Re: T700 v KTM 950 Adv
im with crossrutted on this one i am a bit biased thoughjohnnyboxer wrote: ↑Tue Dec 29, 2020 9:59 amYou don't need to look at it, when you're riding itCrossrutted wrote: ↑Fri Dec 25, 2020 5:50 pm Bob, you failed to mention the T7 aesthetics-or lack of.
A good graphics set almost makes them acceptable , almost but not quite.
I thought the 790 was grim looking but the T7 makes it look like a supermodel !
The 950 was a design classic, functional in the extreme, won Dakar until the rules changed.
I like my 2004 950S better than the 990s and SE's I had. I can stand and look at it all day.
The Tenere 600s of the 80's were superb looking bikes, but would appear to be Yamaha's styling zenith.![]()
790R, good looking?.................you need Specsavers![]()
dave.
- Attachments
-
- IMG_20200822_145305.jpg (172.44 KiB) Viewed 2629 times
-
Tonibe63
- Posts: 3096
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2011 2:05 pm
- Has thanked: 1548 times
- Been thanked: 690 times
Re: T700 v KTM 950 Adv
Where is that crossing Dave? Many years ago we used to do one out towards Melton/Grantham way ...... I think 
Open your eyes and you see what is in front of you, open your mind and you see a bigger picture but open your heart and you see a whole new World.
Re: T700 v KTM 950 Adv
Stokesay castle,
so i was told by a local, we camped at rattlinghope and rode the trails around the area earlier in the year when we were allowed out
- boboneleg
- Posts: 5252
- Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2011 5:52 pm
- Has thanked: 2496 times
- Been thanked: 1485 times
-
Crossrutted
- Posts: 1767
- Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2012 6:18 pm
- Has thanked: 75 times
- Been thanked: 181 times
Re: T700 v KTM 950 Adv
Pay attention at the back .johnnyboxer wrote: ↑Tue Dec 29, 2020 9:59 am
790R, good looking?.................you need Specsavers![]()
I didn't say the 790 was good looking, JB - I said " I thought the 790 was grim looking but the T7 makes it look like a supermodel !"
More comprehension homework for you!
-
Crossrutted
- Posts: 1767
- Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2012 6:18 pm
- Has thanked: 75 times
- Been thanked: 181 times
Re: T700 v KTM 950 Adv
boboneleg wrote: ↑Sat Dec 26, 2020 10:50 amNice try at a wind up Rob, but I'm not bitingCrossrutted wrote: ↑Fri Dec 25, 2020 5:50 pm Bob, you failed to mention the T7 aesthetics-or lack of.
IMO it is so bloody ugly - what is going on with the high headstock compared to the seat?
A good graphics set almost makes them acceptable , almost but not quite.
I thought the 790 was grim looking but the T7 makes it look like a supermodel !
The 950 was a design classic, functional in the extreme, won Dakar until the rules changed.
I like my 2004 950S better than the 990s and SE's I had. I can stand and look at it all day.
The Tenere 600s of the 80's were superb looking bikes, but would appear to be Yamaha's styling zenith.![]()
![]()
Spoilsport Bob.
HNY by the way
- boboneleg
- Posts: 5252
- Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2011 5:52 pm
- Has thanked: 2496 times
- Been thanked: 1485 times
-
gqelements
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2014 10:33 pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 9 times
Re: T700 v KTM 950 Adv
I'm a big T700 fan. It's the best middle-weight ADV bike out there in my opinion.
-
EWR
- Posts: 94
- Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2019 8:30 pm
- Location: Cambs
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 35 times
Re: T700 v KTM 950 Adv
Let's park the bike and take a picture of it on a level crossing while standing with our back to rail traffic: staggering.dave h wrote: ↑Tue Dec 29, 2020 11:51 amIMG_20200822_105058 (1).jpgjohnnyboxer wrote: ↑Tue Dec 29, 2020 9:59 amYou don't need to look at it, when you're riding itCrossrutted wrote: ↑Fri Dec 25, 2020 5:50 pm Bob, you failed to mention the T7 aesthetics-or lack of.
A good graphics set almost makes them acceptable , almost but not quite.
I thought the 790 was grim looking but the T7 makes it look like a supermodel !
The 950 was a design classic, functional in the extreme, won Dakar until the rules changed.
I like my 2004 950S better than the 990s and SE's I had. I can stand and look at it all day.
The Tenere 600s of the 80's were superb looking bikes, but would appear to be Yamaha's styling zenith.![]()
790R, good looking?.................you need Specsavers![]()
im with crossrutted on this one i am a bit biased though![]()
dave.
And in view of neighbouring properties and other road users: brilliant.
No wonder parts of the biking community get the reputation they do.
As someone who works in the industry, please don't do it, regardless of how well you think you know the location. If you get hit, you won't win. I know, because I've seen the aftermath and have been there to pick up the pieces. Rant over.
