Is this a new low for the Police

[uturntony]

Scum on the make - a revenue exercise. If they were really interested in safety they would be standing on the pavement in full view. When the police and the government can accept that a fast driver is not necessarily a dangerous driver and that a slow driver is not necessarily a safe driver then progress can be made. I should point out that I have no
penalty points against me and never have.

Trevor

Scum on the make is a bit strong but hard to disagree with the rest.

[-Ralph-]

So, what if they were waiting to catch a terrorist, or a mugger, would it still be a new low?

Why do so many people think that it's somehow unfair to be caught breaking the law?

If you think that speeding is ok, then start a campaign to change the law.

The law doesn't always make common sense. It's not the law that needs changed, it's application of the speed limits, where and why.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

[-Ralph-]

Scum on the make - a revenue exercise. If they were really interested in safety they would be standing on the pavement in full view. When the police and the government can accept that a fast driver is not necessarily a dangerous driver and that a slow driver is not necessarily a safe driver then progress can be made. I should point out that I have no
penalty points against me and never have.

Trevor

The "scum" are just blokes making a living just like you or me. We might not agree with our boss, but we do what he tells us because he pays the wage bill.

I can't disagree with what you say about safe/slow and unsafe/fast drivers, and on a clear motorway in dry weather 90mph is perfectly safe, but this is through a village, so I find it really hard to agree that they are just "on the make".

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

[SIF]

Scum on the make - a revenue exercise. If they were really interested in safety they would be standing on the pavement in full view. When the police and the government can accept that a fast driver is not necessarily a dangerous driver and that a slow driver is not necessarily a safe driver then progress can be made. I should point out that I have no
penalty points against me and never have.

Trevor

No place for that on this forum in my opinion. Yes it's sneaky but scum, is that really appropriate? If they stood in full view it kind of defeats the point really, a bit like posted speed limits which are presumably being ignored hence why they are there. Be honest, we all know that speeding in the 30s and 40s is a no no and socially unacceptable. There's a reason advanced police drivers obey them even on driving courses, Nationals (GLF) are something else entirely...

[g00ner]

Scum on the make - a revenue exercise. If they were really interested in safety they would be standing on the pavement in full view. When the police and the government can accept that a fast driver is not necessarily a dangerous driver and that a slow driver is not necessarily a safe driver then progress can be made. I should point out that I have no
penalty points against me and never have.

Trevor

Hey Trev, you're a cock (thumbs)

[COULTERMAN]

Yeah check me going to help those two in a tight situation! Yes have laws but I'm sure those two prats could be better employed catching burglars or watering hanging baskets or something

[simonw]

Is there any point to this thread?

The subject line doesn't invite debate but instead simply pre-judges the situation with the predictable and tiresome consequence that the forum will be divided in two (yet again).

[-Ralph-]

Is there any point to this thread?

The subject line doesn't invite debate but instead simply pre-judges the situation with the predictable and tiresome consequence that the forum will be divided in two (yet again).

An insight which has so far escaped the rest of us.

Good point!

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

[PaulinBont]

Is there any point to this thread?

The subject line doesn't invite debate but instead simply pre-judges the situation with the predictable and tiresome consequence that the forum will be divided in two (yet again).

Who agrees with Simon and who doesn't

[johnnyboxer]

Is there any point to this thread?

The subject line doesn't invite debate but instead simply pre-judges the situation with the predictable and tiresome consequence that the forum will be divided in two (yet again).

Speeding is anti social, stick to the posted limits especially in built areas

Impossible to go faster than 60 in NSL areas in N Yorkshire as we have 16 camera vans & 2-3 blokes with tripod cameras & FJR 1300's

Still, you can take in the view at 59.5mph