Prometheus

[cozmo1589]

Well its in my diary as i work in the outdoor event industry and happen to be working on the Red Carpet Premier for this film!! Its being held at the Odeon Cinema Leicester Square on Thurs 31st May. All kicks off around 5pm so if you're about, pop on down, should be usual Leicester Square Party Atmosphere (weather permitting)

Yawnnnn! Just got in at 6am after working on the Prothemus Premier in Leicester Square London, it was manic day building the event but twas worth it in the end. Hoping to se it very soon

premier31.5.2012.jpg (74.76 KiB) Viewed 1481 times

[Willy_Eckerslike]

Absolutely brilliant. Lives up to it's predecessor but stands up as a great film in it's own right. Not going to say any more until you lot have seen it. I give it five stasis pods out of five.

[claw]

I thought it was great as well.

Not often i'd want to see a film twice at the cinema usually once then get the blu ray/dvd, but i'm tempted to go and see it again.

[Fried Egg Sandwich]

Yes it was rather good wasn't it?

Won't spoil it for those that haven't seen it yet... just go see it :silly:

[davsato]

........Glad of that, I often think the problem with sci-fi prequels made 20 years after the originals is that the technology often looks more modern than the original, because of all the advances in CGI. Seemed that way to me with the prequels to Star Wars, and from the trailer this looks like it suffers from the same problem.......

but is CGI any better? those utterly crap joke robot army soldiers and the twat jarjar binks ruined the prequel films. sometimes they go too far, i think, a- because they can, and b- they think they have to use 100% of what theyve got, when sometimes less is more.

i may take my nipper to see prometheus on orange wednesday when its BOGOF, does anyone else cringe at the price of cinemas these days?

[Willy_Eckerslike]

I thought it was great as well.

Not often i'd want to see a film twice at the cinema usually once then get the blu ray/dvd, but i'm tempted to go and see it again.

Did you watch it in 2 or 3D?

[Sparkton]

I saw this today and thought it was amazing!!

I am a big fan of the "original" Alien, so was looking forward to this (nobody likes to call it) prequel.

Without giving anything away, it is definitely linked to the original storyline and i think it was directed with the same type of tense atmosphere.

Sadly though, I also think it was a little rushed, i can't imagine an expedition of two years in cryo and half a billion miles in distance, the crew have to go exploring the minute they set down on the planet? (not so in Alien).

Also, what are the chances of entering the atmosphere of the planet to find the alien site within three minutes??? Mmmmm?

Sorry, sounding like a geek now!!!

[Willy_Eckerslike]

How about giving everyone a chance to see it before posting details.

[Sparkton]

"How about giving everyone a chance to see it before posting details."


Sorry!! I was only trying to open a discussion about the movie!

I don't think i have given away any secrets or the plot of the movie???

There is much more detail in my local newspaper tonight as I'm sure there is nationwide.

Bloody hell, I'm off!

[Freeloadeur]

........Glad of that, I often think the problem with sci-fi prequels made 20 years after the originals is that the technology often looks more modern than the original, because of all the advances in CGI. Seemed that way to me with the prequels to Star Wars, and from the trailer this looks like it suffers from the same problem.......

but is CGI any better? those utterly crap joke robot army soldiers and the twat jarjar binks ruined the prequel films. sometimes they go too far, i think, a- because they can, and b- they think they have to use 100% of what theyve got, when sometimes less is more.

No, often I don't think it is, like you I think it's often a case of impress with the CGI not with the plot.