Must be a relative of Diane AbbotHedgeHopper wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2019 6:39 pm
Are you joking?, heres a taste of this pillocks integrity.......
Speaking to presenter Emma Barnett, he claimed 80% of the British public supported the prime minister’s Brexit deal.
Pressed by Emma as to where he had got the information, he said: “I’m producing a number to try to illustrate what I believe.”
EU. In or out?
-
- Posts: 1554
- Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2016 11:38 am
- Location: East Sussex
- Has thanked: 830 times
- Been thanked: 417 times
Re: EU. In or out?
2023 Husqvarna Norden 901
2014 KTM 690 ENDURO R
2014 KTM 690 ENDURO R
- OB1
- Posts: 2770
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2011 11:37 am
- Location: Ipswich, Suffolk
- Has thanked: 746 times
- Been thanked: 342 times
Re: EU. In or out?
daveuprite wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2019 6:20 pmHe reminds me of a Dickensian undertaker.
Interesting that, yet again, the UK will get another prime minister it never voted for. Obviously, we all know that the system allows it, and you vote in GEs for the party, not the leader, but with this upcoming tory internal election it will be over 50% of all PMs who never had a public mandate.
John Major may not have been voted in during a General Election, however, he did win one in 1992, so he did actually have a mandate.
A • AND • B • CDN • CH • CN • CY • CYM • CZ • D • DK • E • EST • ET • F • FIN • GR • HK • HR • I • IL • IRL • L • LT • LV • M • N • N-IRL • NL • P • PL • Q • RSM • S • SCO • SCV • SLO • TR • USA • YU
justrtw.com
justrtw.com
-
- Posts: 4790
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 10:47 pm
- Location: Limousin France
- Has thanked: 2452 times
- Been thanked: 3293 times
Re: EU. In or out?
Yeah, very true. But there was a period in which Major was PM purely by virtue of the ousting of Thatcher and an internal tory party selection process. It wasn't until 1992 that he had a GE mandate. In that short period without one he presided over the Maastricht Treaty signing and the 91 Gulf War.
And in a few weeks it looks like the UK will again have a new prime minister, at a time of national crisis, who will have been chosen by 313 tory MPs and just 124,000 tory party members.
The principle that the electorate votes for a party, which becomes a government, rather than for an individual as prime minister, is all very well - and perhaps less of an issue in the past - but these days the personal ideology and prejudices of one person appointed PM has a disproportionate impact on the country's direction. Just look at Teresa May's anti-immigration stance and her poor negotiating skills. She has had a huge impact on the way brexit has been managed (hardly the right word), above and beyond the blame that can be assigned to the government as a whole. Imagine the nightmare of Johnson as PM. A bumbling upper-class opportunist twit with a track record of being totally out of his depth. He shouldn't be allowed anywhere near government, let alone number ten, and especially not without endorsement from the general public.
-
- Posts: 3519
- Joined: Tue May 09, 2017 9:03 pm
- Has thanked: 1414 times
- Been thanked: 1669 times
Re: EU. In or out?
Interesting to note though, that at the time of the 1940 crisis, Churchill became PM with the support of the Libs and Labour, and in the teeth of opposition from the right-wing of the Conservatives who wanted to do a deal with Hitler.
As George Orwell wrote at the time "the Tories have always hated Churchill"...thanks to his record as a Liberal Government social reformer before the First World War.
The Government led by Churchill in WWII was an anti-fascist coalition, including Labour and Liberals. Churchill was constantly sniped at and undermined by the right of the Tory party, which he saw off thanks to the support he gained from those to his political left!
Rees-Mogg and Johnson both like being photographed under pictures of Churchill, but in reality they hate everything he stood for (World peace though European unity, Wage Councils to protect low-paid workers, support for unemployed workers etc).
As George Orwell wrote at the time "the Tories have always hated Churchill"...thanks to his record as a Liberal Government social reformer before the First World War.
The Government led by Churchill in WWII was an anti-fascist coalition, including Labour and Liberals. Churchill was constantly sniped at and undermined by the right of the Tory party, which he saw off thanks to the support he gained from those to his political left!
Rees-Mogg and Johnson both like being photographed under pictures of Churchill, but in reality they hate everything he stood for (World peace though European unity, Wage Councils to protect low-paid workers, support for unemployed workers etc).
- OB1
- Posts: 2770
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2011 11:37 am
- Location: Ipswich, Suffolk
- Has thanked: 746 times
- Been thanked: 342 times
Re: EU. In or out?
I remember when May was "elected" by her peers and there were calls from the left for a general election to prove that the Conservatives had the mandate to rule with their new leader. At the same time, they conveniently forgot that Gordon Brown ascended to the position of Prime Minister in a similar (unchallenged) manner to Theresa May just a few years earlier.
I just wish that certain Euroskeptics would stop perpetuating the lie that people such as Donald Tusk are "unelected bureaucrats": just like the leaders of any of the UK parties, members of the European Council are elected by the member states. The election that we are having this week will elect our representatives to the EU parliament: they are the people who elect those above them, just like what happens within the UK parliament. The trouble is, Nigel Farage will call them unelected bureaucrats, then the Daily Mail will repeat his comment and the unthinking public will regurgitate the same myth... In reality, what they are saying is that "I didn't vote for them". But, then again, they probably won't vote in the forthcoming EU election...
I just wish that certain Euroskeptics would stop perpetuating the lie that people such as Donald Tusk are "unelected bureaucrats": just like the leaders of any of the UK parties, members of the European Council are elected by the member states. The election that we are having this week will elect our representatives to the EU parliament: they are the people who elect those above them, just like what happens within the UK parliament. The trouble is, Nigel Farage will call them unelected bureaucrats, then the Daily Mail will repeat his comment and the unthinking public will regurgitate the same myth... In reality, what they are saying is that "I didn't vote for them". But, then again, they probably won't vote in the forthcoming EU election...
A • AND • B • CDN • CH • CN • CY • CYM • CZ • D • DK • E • EST • ET • F • FIN • GR • HK • HR • I • IL • IRL • L • LT • LV • M • N • N-IRL • NL • P • PL • Q • RSM • S • SCO • SCV • SLO • TR • USA • YU
justrtw.com
justrtw.com
-
- Posts: 4443
- Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 6:14 pm
- Has thanked: 2280 times
- Been thanked: 992 times
Re: EU. In or out?
Life seemed so much simpler when we had a king
There was loads of pink on the world map.
Sweets were 3p a packet.
Crisps were 4p a packet.
Britain was the best in the world.
There was Democracy.
Fairness and Justice .
Black n white TV came out.
And people had respect.
Then I grew up(sort of)
and bought a bike
There was loads of pink on the world map.
Sweets were 3p a packet.
Crisps were 4p a packet.
Britain was the best in the world.
There was Democracy.
Fairness and Justice .
Black n white TV came out.
And people had respect.
Then I grew up(sort of)
and bought a bike
Re: EU. In or out?
The only difference was that we were far more ignorant of the bad news than we are today ..... and black & white tele was sh*tegaryboy wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 1:19 pm Life seemed so much simpler when we had a king
There was loads of pink on the world map.
Sweets were 3p a packet.
Crisps were 4p a packet.
Britain was the best in the world.
There was Democracy.
Fairness and Justice .
Black n white TV came out.
And people had respect.
Then I grew up(sort of)
and bought a bike
-
- Posts: 1554
- Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2016 11:38 am
- Location: East Sussex
- Has thanked: 830 times
- Been thanked: 417 times
Re: EU. In or out?
I may be wrong...probably am...but we can ultimately get rid of any MP or MEP. But we, the great European unwashed, can’t get rid of the EU bureaucrats, which is where the problem lies.OB1 wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 11:11 am I remember when May was "elected" by her peers and there were calls from the left for a general election to prove that the Conservatives had the mandate to rule with their new leader. At the same time, they conveniently forgot that Gordon Brown ascended to the position of Prime Minister in a similar (unchallenged) manner to Theresa May just a few years earlier.
I just wish that certain Euroskeptics would stop perpetuating the lie that people such as Donald Tusk are "unelected bureaucrats": just like the leaders of any of the UK parties, members of the European Council are elected by the member states. The election that we are having this week will elect our representatives to the EU parliament: they are the people who elect those above them, just like what happens within the UK parliament. The trouble is, Nigel Farage will call them unelected bureaucrats, then the Daily Mail will repeat his comment and the unthinking public will regurgitate the same myth... In reality, what they are saying is that "I didn't vote for them". But, then again, they probably won't vote in the forthcoming EU election...
2023 Husqvarna Norden 901
2014 KTM 690 ENDURO R
2014 KTM 690 ENDURO R
-
- Posts: 4790
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 10:47 pm
- Location: Limousin France
- Has thanked: 2452 times
- Been thanked: 3293 times
Re: EU. In or out?
In a similar way, you can't 'get rid of' the mandarin civil servants in Whitehall. Nor would you want to. They bring many years of experience, understanding and diplomatic skills to the business of government. Behind the angry facade of temporary political battles, there is always, in any governing establishment, a large group of people quietly carrying out the wishes of their political masters whilst gently reminding them of the consequences of similar wishes before. You don't think that the Chancellor or the Health Secretary actually DOES anything, do you?DavidS wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 7:21 pmI may be wrong...probably am...but we can ultimately get rid of any MP or MEP. But we, the great European unwashed, can’t get rid of the EU bureaucrats, which is where the problem lies.OB1 wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 11:11 am I remember when May was "elected" by her peers and there were calls from the left for a general election to prove that the Conservatives had the mandate to rule with their new leader. At the same time, they conveniently forgot that Gordon Brown ascended to the position of Prime Minister in a similar (unchallenged) manner to Theresa May just a few years earlier.
I just wish that certain Euroskeptics would stop perpetuating the lie that people such as Donald Tusk are "unelected bureaucrats": just like the leaders of any of the UK parties, members of the European Council are elected by the member states. The election that we are having this week will elect our representatives to the EU parliament: they are the people who elect those above them, just like what happens within the UK parliament. The trouble is, Nigel Farage will call them unelected bureaucrats, then the Daily Mail will repeat his comment and the unthinking public will regurgitate the same myth... In reality, what they are saying is that "I didn't vote for them". But, then again, they probably won't vote in the forthcoming EU election...
This evil euro-bureaucrat myth is exactly that. A myth. Spread very successfully by the Daily Mail, UKIP, Farage etc.
I've been a part of European cooperation projects, back in a saner time, and the things you remember most about them is that they are virtuous, slow, steeped in boring audits and checks, and quietly collaborative. Sometimes very useful but generally harmless and rather dull. Certainly not threatening to sovereignty or power-grabbing in any way. Just the paperwork alone would prevent that! If you could level any real criticism at the workings of the EU, it is that the organisation is paperwork-heavy. An argument for reform, definitely not withdrawal.
The current anti-EU hysteria is a powerful invention of those who are looking for figure-heads they can oppose. This is how the extreme/far-right works and exactly how it delivered mass acquiescence in early 1930s Germany.
Last edited by daveuprite on Mon May 20, 2019 8:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.