Isn't the S10...... heavy

The Things We Ride
johnnyboxer
Posts: 7920
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2012 10:53 am
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 523 times

Isn't the S10...... heavy

Post by johnnyboxer »

Had a good look around a nice used S10 yesterday, in a bike shop

Seems all well screwed together, apart from the exhaust designer who needs to go to Specsavers :whistle:

Went to pick it up from the sidestand to feel the weight, whilst holding onto the rack

Blimey she's a lardy old girl, now I know where the over 260kg quoted weight comes from now :ohmy:

I don't fancy pushing that around the garage and it felt heavier than my 1150 GSA, maybe because the weight was higher CofG?
We buy things we don't need



With money we don't have



To impress people we don't even like
User avatar
92kk k100lt 193214
Posts: 2332
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 10:32 pm
Location: Ireland Cork
Has thanked: 51 times
Been thanked: 155 times

Re: Isn't the S10 heavy?

Post by 92kk k100lt 193214 »

It is heavier than the GSA by about 30kg....

I have a K100LT and a K100RT and there is a weight difference between them that words don't describe. The RT felt nimble by comparison with the LT. The difference in weight was down to stuff added to the LT like entertainment, heated grips, ABS, some different body parts but significantly almost all of the extra weight is up higher. I cant get my feet flat on the ground on either so this makes the weight difference more significant. The K100RT is much the same weight as the GSA and I feel is my limit of what I can manage.
1992 K100LT June 2010 110,000 miles
1984 K100RT July 2013 36,000 miles, 90,000
1983 K100RS Nov 2018 29,000 miles, 58,600 miles
1996 K1100LT Oct 2020 37,990 miles, 48,990 miles
1984 K100 Sprint March 2023 58,000 miles, 62,000 miles
Redsoul
Posts: 382
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2012 12:11 pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Isn't the S10 heavy?

Post by Redsoul »

Strange...yes on paper the S10 is a heavy old girl but the first thing I noticed when lifting off side-stand was how light she felt especially after owning a varadero....put this down to the very low centre of gravity the bike has.
Bernard Smith
Posts: 2001
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2012 5:44 pm

Re: Isn't the S10 heavy?

Post by Bernard Smith »

It is heavy, really heavy.

I think, for me, it was probably an age thing (59) as I had one for three months only.

It's a lovely, lovely bike on the move and so beautifully balanced.

As a 'dead weight' it's damn awkward to move due to the weight. I found it heavy around the 'house' so to speak and also around camp sites, car parks, and all such places. Anything involving 'paddling' on an everyday level was such an effort.

But it's a great engine (thumbs)




Reader’s Digest on TOUCHING THE WORLD - “…rueful, irreverent, always incredibly vivid, unfailingly honest, a powerful love story in a book crammed with astonishing achievements.”



http://www.worldtour.org.uk



http://www.amazon.co.uk/product-reviews ... wpoints=1/
jonny955
Posts: 1157
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2011 9:02 am
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Isn't the S10 heavy?

Post by jonny955 »

Did Yamaha put all the heavy expensive parts on the S10 as low as possible to ensure they sell lots of replacements when the bash plate fails?.. :lol:

Jon
johnnyboxer
Posts: 7920
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2012 10:53 am
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 523 times

Re: Isn't the S10 heavy?

Post by johnnyboxer »

Redsoul wrote:Strange...yes on paper the S10 is a heavy old girl but the first thing I noticed when lifting off side-stand was how light she felt especially after owning a varadero....put this down to the very low centre of gravity the bike has.
Must be me, I thought she was heavy when I took her off the stand and wiiiide :P
We buy things we don't need



With money we don't have



To impress people we don't even like
-Ralph-
Posts: 6803
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 7:16 pm

Re: Isn't the S10 heavy?

Post by -Ralph- »

My Tiger Sport is 235kg wet, and I've given up pushing or padding it around, unless it's just backwards out of the garage. It's just easier to jump on and start the engine, and think when you're parking it so that you're facing the right way on the way out.
"Luke, you're going to find that many of the truths we cling to depend greatly on our own point of view" - Obi-Wan Kenobi
herman
Posts: 5359
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 7:51 pm
Has thanked: 878 times
Been thanked: 632 times

Re: Isn't the S10...... heavy

Post by herman »

Yes it bloody well is and I have already tested my crashbars in the lay over test :blush: Heaviest bike I have ever had but it should do the job intended which is mainly touring.
The secret of a long life is knowing when its time to go.
Nigel
Posts: 4010
Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2011 2:32 pm
Has thanked: 189 times
Been thanked: 102 times

Re: Isn't the S10...... heavy

Post by Nigel »

Yes she`s a big ole girl when you push her around but you can ride to a standstill feet up she is so well balanced (thumbs) as for lifting her off the sidestand no worse than the 800 GS I had and not as top heavy :whistle: also better balanced on the centre stand and no harder to get on the stand (thumbs)
Zookman
Posts: 1993
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 2:07 pm
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 36 times

Re: Isn't the S10 heavy?

Post by Zookman »

92kk k100lt 193214 wrote:It is heavier than the GSA by about 30kg....

I have a K100LT and a K100RT and there is a weight difference between them that words don't describe. The RT felt nimble by comparison with the LT. The difference in weight was down to stuff added to the LT like entertainment, heated grips, ABS, some different body parts but significantly almost all of the extra weight is up higher. I cant get my feet flat on the ground on either so this makes the weight difference more significant. The K100RT is much the same weight as the GSA and I feel is my limit of what I can manage.
You trying to tell us that the GSA has a wet weight of 230 kilos ?
Post Reply

Return to “BIKES”